The only rock solid, no Kaep needed teams *I think* are: :eagles: :seahawks: :KC: :ravens: :texans: :vikes: :cowboys: :49ers:

If you he wanted to be a backup or couldn't find a good supporting role elsewhere, KC would be a good fit for him, schemewise

Show thread

@thomas I can’t see him on the Bears for a combo reason. 1-2 is Foles/Trubisky. 3 is I can totally see us going QB if we have a horrible season with a Trevor Lawrence/Justin Fields/etc in play.

@LuigiEsq Yeah, sorry, I meant "other teams after the Pats picked up Cam"

@thomas god I would LOVE Kaep on the Bears. We passed up DeShaun freaking Watson for Dipshit McGee and while he did fine last year, Im not confident it will be a repeat performance.

A city with a 30% Black population has never had a Black quarterback :|

@ItsJenNotGabby I mean, y'all have the greatest postseason QB of all time, you'll be fine!

@thomas ok but hear me out:

Kaep and Nick and mitch can ride the bench this year, then back up Kaep for another 2, then see what happens

@ItsJenNotGabby There's not a world where Kaep isn't the better QB there, but the Bears seem to have hitched their wagon to Trubisky

@ItsJenNotGabby although who knows, maybe not. Picking up Foles is weird if they are. He's the backup with the best resume, obviously

@thomas shooting ourselves in the foot when we dont have to: its the Bears way

@ItsJenNotGabby @thomas being hella racist to your own detriment: [Sean Connery voice] it's the Chicago way

Sign in to participate in the conversation

Welcome to! Allpro is a place to discuss sports, sports related things, etc. General stuff is fine (if you're watching the game with friends, you don't *only* talk about the game after all), but try to keep on topic.