Before 1879, when the first crop of power pitchers arrived in the :lnp: and attempted to strangle the nascent first live-ball era, exactly four no-hitters had been thrown.

Three of them were by excellent pitchers.

This is the other guy's story.

Let's talk about José Saenz.

Saenz was 22 when the LNP began, and while he had undistinguished stuff, he had the chance to be a masterful control pitcher.

He was drafted by the with their 9th-round pick and then . . . didn't pitch at all. The Leones released him in August, after the season ended.

Show thread

Luckily, a month later, Saenz managed to sign for a little more money with the . . . and got released in December.

January got him a contract from the , and he was named the #98 prospect in the entire league just as the season began.

Show thread

In April of 1873, he was the #86 prospect.

In 1874, he was #98. Again.

In 1875, he was #61.

What you need to understand here is that there were no minor leagues. Saenz wasn't playing ball for a Texan League affiliate or in the US.

He was riding pine year after miserable year.

Show thread

José Saenz made his LNP pitching debut in 1878, by which point he was no longer a top prospect.

On the one hand, he'd been paid to do nothing for several years. On the other, the now had to hope for a miracle from a pitcher who'd been benched for seven seasons.

Show thread

On July 8th against the , they sort of got one.

Saenz struck out four and allowed no hits on 89 pitches—a remarkably efficient outing for a man who averaged 120 pitches per game.

The took advantage of their hot pitcher and slapped together seven runs.

Show thread

But there's two much-needed correctives here:

One, the 1878 were one of the few teams that was as bad at hitting as the .

Two, Saenz, at that point, was 10-20 with a 3.08 ERA. He ended the season 12-25, with a 3.61 ERA (74 ERA+), and 50 BB / 60 K.

Show thread

In 1879, as the strikeout blossomed into a weapon, Saenz held three opponents (the , the , and the ) to three hits, all in the space of a month.

He won all three games—three of the eight his won in that entire month.

Show thread

That year, once his sudden June/July of dominance wore away, Saenz posted the following statline:

1879: 11-25, 3.21 ERA (95 ERA+), 72 BB / 66 K.

It did not improve later.

1880: 10-25, 3.09 ERA (90 ERA+), 52 BB / 69 K.

1881: 11-30 (yikes), 3.60 ERA (85 ERA+), 62 BB / 64 K.

Show thread

In 1883, Saenz managed a feat almost no other pitcher, not even the unlucky bastards the shoved onto the mound, had achieved:

- led the league in losses (34);
- posted an ERA above 6.00;
- had a WHIP above 2.00;
- did 155 BB to 56 Ks;
- had a WAR of -4.6.

In the Golden Era of Pitching, that losses/ERA/K/BB ratio would come to be known as a "Reverse Triple Crown."

Show thread

In 1884, after not managing to do so for three years, José Saenz limited the to three hits, striking out one.

Unfortunately, he walked five, and otherwise allowed four runs, which meant the won that game, 4-1.

Show thread

If you're wondering what a pitcher who manages the rare feat of losing a game in which he only allows three hits looks like, at least in 1884, this is Saenz's current statline:

7.51 ERA (38 ERA+) (¡¡¡!!!)
2.36 WHIP
52 BB / 11 K (0.21 K/BB)
-1.4 WAR (proj. -6.0)

Show thread

And that's the story of José Saenz, who is in the rare company of LNP pitchers who've thrown a no-hitter, the rarer company of LNP starters who've posted negative WAR seasons, and possibly the only pitcher to have thrown a no-hitter and then led the league in losses.

Show thread

We know you're wondering what José Saenz, The Worst Pitcher To Throw a No-Hitter, looked like in 1884 for the .


3-38 (worst in the league);
6.44 ERA (46 ERA+) (worst in the league);
209 BB / 62 SO (tied for worst K/BB in the league)
-5.6 WAR (worst in the league).

Show thread

We'd like to announce that we're officially adding José Saenz, The Worst Pitcher To Throw a No-Hitter, to the canon.

Sign in to participate in the conversation

Welcome to! Allpro is a place to discuss sports, sports related things, etc. General stuff is fine (if you're watching the game with friends, you don't *only* talk about the game after all), but try to keep on topic.